"Zooming out" with a focal-reducer

Reviews and questions about new and old equipment.
Share with us your latest purchase or discuss equipment that you are currently using
Post Reply
User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton
Contact:

"Zooming out" with a focal-reducer

Post by rwilkinson » Sat Dec 05, 2015 11:33 am

Long focal-length telescopes such as Maksutovs and SCTs are great for high-magnification planetary observation and imaging, but for many other objects a wider field-of-view is needed, which requires a shorter focal-length telescope.

But rather than swapping to a shorter optical tube, how about "zooming out" with your existing 'scope?
Well, this is actually possible - by fitting a focal-reducer lens between the 'scope and camera. We've recently purchased one of these for use with our Atik Infinity camera system: http://www.telescopehouse.com/revelatio ... -1-25.html
This type is designed for use with small-sensor imaging systems (the Infinity has a 2/3"-diagonal CCD). A bigger lens would be requred for a DSLR imaging system: these are available, but are rather more expensive (>£100).

Here are some examples of our little Revelation Astro reducer in use with the Infinity camera, trained on a familiar local landmark:
clock_f10.png
C8 SCT at f/10
clock_f10.png (454.06 KiB) Viewed 4298 times
clock_f6.png
Using the focal-reducer to achieve f/5.6
clock_f6.png (475.25 KiB) Viewed 4298 times
clock_f4.png
Adding an extension-tube behind the reducer to achieve f/4.2
clock_f4.png (460.76 KiB) Viewed 4298 times
The reduction-factor of the lens depends on its spacing from the sensor. Fitting the lens right onto the front of the camera's nose-piece produced an f/5.6 system, but then adding a 15mm spacing-ring behind the reducer opened it up to f/4.2.
I found this on-line calculator from Wilmslow AS:
http://www.wilmslowastro.com/software/formulae.htm#FR_b
which helps in working out what can be achieved (the Revelation reducer-lens has a focal-length of around 95mm).
The "in-focus" parameter is a measure of how far the focus-adjustment needs to be retracted to achieve focus. The moving primary mirrors in SCTs & Maksutovs give them a larger focus-range, but refractors have a more limited accommodation, so less focal-reduction can be realised with them.

The benefits of using a focal-reducer include:
  • the larger field-of-view makes it easier to locate your target. and allows larger targets to be imaged
  • a brighter image allows shorter imaging-times
  • the reduced image-scale means that tracking errors are less significant
So compared with my C8's native f/10, operating it at f/4.2 gives a 5.7x larger field-of view, a 5.7x brighter image and reduces my tracking-errors by a factor of 2.4.

Bear in mind that the ultimate image-quality with a focal-reduced 'scope will not be as good as with a telescope expressly designed for this shorter focal-length. But if you only have the one optical tube, using one of these lenses can give it a new lease of life to image a wider range of objects.

User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton
Contact:

Re: "Zooming out" with a focal-reducer

Post by rwilkinson » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:02 am

Here's an example of over-doing the focal-reduction (from f/6.9 down to f/4.1):
panstarrs_10min_f4.png
SW80ED reduced to f/4.1
panstarrs_10min_f4.png (349.27 KiB) Viewed 4226 times
Note the vignetting effect and how the outer stars are distorted.
The wider field-of-view does make it a lot easier to find a target when star-hopping, and you could always crop out the sharp central area around the target.

For comparison, here's the same 'scope operating at its native f/6.9:
panstarrs_15min_f7.png
SW80ED operating at native f/6.9
panstarrs_15min_f7.png (420.21 KiB) Viewed 4226 times
Note that the image is much sharper across the field, but not as bright - even with 900-sec total exposure time compared with 600-sec at f/4.

Post Reply